How Doctors Tell Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Apart: What a Large Study Reveals
Researchers in Norway developed a reliable method to classify Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes using health records. The findings show that administrative data can accurately help public health officials understand how common each type is.
Evidence label explains the kind of source behind this article (for example peer-reviewed literature vs community video). It is not medical advice.
Key takeaways
- A three-step method using health records correctly identified Type 1 diabetes 95% of the time and Type 2 diabetes 98% of the time
- The method works best in middle-aged adults but is less accurate for people over 80
- In Norway in 2022, about 0.72% of adults had Type 1 diabetes and 5.5% had Type 2 diabetes
- Accurate classification matters because Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes need different healthcare approaches
Why Classifying Diabetes Matters
Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes are two distinct conditions with very different causes and treatment needs. Type 1 is an autoimmune condition requiring insulin from the outset, while Type 2 typically involves insulin resistance and develops over time. For hospitals, clinics, and health systems to plan services and resources properly, they need to know how many people in their population have each type. But getting accurate numbers isn't always straightforward.
Researchers in Norway decided to test whether standard health registry data—the electronic records that doctors and hospitals already keep—could be used to reliably separate Type 1 from Type 2 diabetes cases.
The Study and Its Method
Scientists examined health records for all adults aged 18 and older living in Norway in 2022—more than 4.3 million people. They created a three-step classification system that looked at information routinely collected in medical records: whether someone used insulin, whether they had received a Type 1 or Type 2 diagnosis from a specialist, and whether they had a diagnosis recorded in primary care.
They then checked how well their method matched diagnoses recorded in the Norwegian Diabetes Register for Adults, which serves as a reference standard for accurate diabetes classification.
What the Results Showed
The registry-based method performed very well overall. It correctly identified Type 1 diabetes 95.2% of the time and Type 2 diabetes 97.6% of the time. However, accuracy varied by age. For people aged 18 to 59, the method was highly accurate for both types. For those aged 60 to 79, Type 1 identification dropped to 87.6% accuracy. For people over 80, accuracy fell further to 69.4%, likely because older adults may have received their diagnoses long ago when classification practices differed.
When applied to the entire Norwegian population in 2022, the method identified 31,264 adults with Type 1 diabetes (0.72% of the adult population) and 239,120 with Type 2 diabetes (5.5% of the adult population).
What This Means for Health Planning
This study demonstrates that health systems can rely on data they already collect to get accurate counts of how many people have Type 1 versus Type 2 diabetes. This matters for planning clinics, training specialist providers, and ensuring the right resources—like insulin supplies and diabetes educators—are available where they're needed.
The findings suggest that administrative health registries are a valuable tool for epidemiologists and health officials studying diabetes patterns at the population level, though the method may require extra attention when evaluating very elderly populations.
Evidence label
Source: Scandinavian journal of public health. Evidence type: PubMed indexed literature. Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.
Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.
Related reading
More evidence-labeled coverage across the Type1Cure library.
- Diagnosis & Early DetectionA Simple Blood Test May Help Doctors Assess How Severe Your DKA IsPubMed indexed literature
- Diagnosis & Early DetectionA New Approach to Finding Type 1 Diabetes Early: Testing During Routine CheckupsPubMed indexed literature
- Diagnosis & Early DetectionSingle Autoantibody: What It Means When Your Child Tests Positive for One Type 1 MarkerPubMed indexed literature
- Diagnosis & Early DetectionKetosis-Prone Type 2 Diabetes: New Clues to an Immune Mix-UpPubMed indexed literature
- Diagnosis & Early DetectionWhy Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Before Symptoms MatterPubMed indexed literature
- Diagnosis & Early DetectionTesting for Type 1 Before Symptoms Appear: What a Real-World Pilot LearnedPubMed indexed literature