
How Insulin Pumps Help Kids and Teens Keep Blood Sugar in Range
A new study shows that children and adolescents who switch from daily insulin injections to pump therapy—especially automated systems—see meaningful improvements in their glucose control within the first six months.
Evidence label explains the kind of source behind this article (for example peer-reviewed literature vs community video). It is not medical advice.
Key takeaways
- Children and teens who moved from multiple daily injections (MDI) to insulin pumps spent significantly more time with blood sugar in their target range after just three months.
- Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems showed the strongest benefits, with larger improvements in time in range and reductions in high blood sugar episodes.
- Both automated and non-automated pump systems were studied, giving families a clearer picture of different pump technology options.
- Improvements in glucose control continued from the 3-month mark through 6 months, suggesting benefits build over time as users and families adjust to the new system.
What This Study Looked At
Researchers at a pediatric diabetes center in the United States studied 50 children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes as they transitioned from daily insulin injections to pump therapy. The average age of the participants was about 10 years old. Before switching to a pump, the team measured each child's blood sugar control for three months using insulin injections as their baseline. Then they tracked how well the children managed their blood sugar for the next six months using pumps.
The study included two main types of pump technology. About 78% of the group used an automated insulin delivery (AID) system—the Medtronic MiniMed 780G—which automatically adjusts insulin delivery based on blood sugar readings. The remaining 22% used the Omnipod DASH, a non-automated pump that requires manual input but still offers continuous insulin delivery.
Key Results: Time in Range Improved
The biggest finding was that children and teens spent significantly more time with their blood sugar in the healthy target range after switching to pumps. Before the transition, their baseline time in range wasn't specified in this report. After three months on pump therapy, the group averaged 70.9% time in range—meaning their blood sugar was where it should be for about seven out of every ten hours tracked. By six months, that number improved further to 73.2%.
At the same time, the time their blood sugar spent too high (above range) decreased meaningfully. At three months, high blood sugar episodes dropped to about 26.5% of the day, and by six months, fell to 24.3%. These reductions were statistically significant, meaning the improvements were not due to chance.
Automated Systems Showed Stronger Results
When researchers looked separately at the children using automated insulin delivery systems, the benefits were even more pronounced. This group showed greater increases in time in range and more significant reductions in both high blood sugar events and a measure called glucose management indicator (GMI), which estimates what an HbA1c result would be based on recent glucose readings.
This doesn't mean non-automated pumps aren't helpful—both types of pumps improved glucose control. However, the data suggests that automated systems may offer an additional advantage, likely because they continuously adjust insulin delivery without requiring manual input from the user.
What This Means for Families Considering Pumps
If your child or teen currently uses multiple daily injections and you're thinking about switching to an insulin pump, this study offers encouraging evidence. The improvements in blood sugar control appear relatively quickly—within three months—and continue to build over time. This suggests the body and the person using the pump both benefit from an adjustment period as they become more comfortable with the technology.
It's important to remember this was a preliminary study from a single pediatric center with 50 children. Families considering pump therapy should talk with their diabetes care team about which system might be the best fit for their individual situation, daily routine, and preferences. Every child with Type 1 diabetes is unique, and what works well for one person may differ for another.
Evidence label
Source: Children (Basel, Switzerland). Evidence type: PubMed indexed literature. Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.
Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.
Related reading
More evidence-labeled coverage across the Type1Cure library.
- Living With T1DCorrection to "The Use of an Automated Insulin Delivery System Is Associated With a Reduction in Diabetes Distress and Improvement in Quality of Life in People With Type 1 Diabetes".PubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DA New Class of Biologics Could Change How We Treat Type 1 DiabetesPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DThe Promise and Challenge of Oral Insulin: Where the Research StandsPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DYour Glucose Range May Not Be the Guideline Range—And That's Worth UnderstandingPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DHow Thoughts About Thoughts May Fuel Emotional Stress in Type 1 DiabetesPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DDigital Health Literacy May Help Teens with Type 1 Diabetes Improve Self-Care and Well-BeingPubMed indexed literature