Close-up of a woman's hands holding insulin pens. Perfect for health and diabetes-related content.
Hannah Barata (Pexels) / Pexels License
Living With T1D/July 26, 2026/3 min read

First Real-World Study of twiist Automated Insulin Delivery System Shows Promising Glycemic Control

A new 8-week study of the twiist AID system in 19 adults with Type 1 diabetes found that participants spent about 70% of their time in target glucose ranges. The system detected potential insulin delivery problems quickly, helping users stay on track with their insulin therapy.

PubMed indexed literature

Evidence label explains the kind of source behind this article (for example peer-reviewed literature vs community video). It is not medical advice.

living with t1dmental healthtechnologysupport

Key takeaways

  • Adults using twiist achieved a mean time in range of 70.3%, meaning their glucose stayed in the 70–180 mg/dL target range for most of the day
  • The system detected occlusion events (blockages that interrupt insulin delivery) within 30 minutes, allowing users to respond promptly
  • Participants with a baseline HbA1c above 7% saw an average decrease of 0.4%, showing improvement in longer-term glucose control
  • Higher basal insulin ratio settings were linked to better time in range, suggesting personalized system adjustments matter
  • One participant did not complete the 8-week study; 19 of 20 finished, indicating good tolerability overall

What Is the twiist Automated Insulin Delivery System?

The twiist is an automated insulin delivery (AID) system designed to help adults with Type 1 diabetes manage their blood glucose more easily. Like other AID systems, it works by continuously sensing glucose levels and automatically adjusting insulin delivery based on those readings. This study was the first to evaluate how well twiist performs in real-world conditions with actual users.

How Well Did Participants Control Their Glucose?

Researchers followed 20 adults with Type 1 diabetes for 8 weeks while using twiist. The main measure of success was time in range (TIR)—the percentage of time glucose stayed between 70 and 180 mg/dL, a standard target range. On average, participants spent 70.3% of their time in this range, meaning glucose remained in a healthy zone for most of the day.

When researchers looked at other glucose metrics, participants met or maintained their targets for most measures. However, they spent more time above 250 mg/dL than the study's target goal, suggesting room for improvement in preventing very high glucose levels.

How Does the System Handle Technical Problems?

One of the most important safety features of any insulin pump is detecting when insulin delivery gets blocked. During the study, 15 participants experienced 67 occlusion events—times when something prevented insulin from flowing properly. Critically, the twiist system detected these blockages within 30 minutes, giving users a window to troubleshoot and prevent their glucose from rising dangerously.

This rapid detection is important because undetected occlusions can lead to missed insulin doses and blood sugar spikes. The system's ability to flag these events quickly supports user safety.

What Settings Make the Biggest Difference?

The study examined whether specific system settings influenced glucose control. Participants who set higher maximum basal insulin ratios—a measure of how much background insulin the pump can deliver—achieved higher time in range. Similarly, participants who adjusted their correction range (the insulin dose for bringing down high glucose) to 100 mg/dL or wider also saw better results. This suggests that taking time to personalize these settings may improve outcomes.

For people with higher baseline HbA1c levels (above 7%), the system helped bring that number down by an average of 0.4% over 8 weeks. HbA1c is a measure of average glucose control over 2–3 months, so even modest improvements can reflect meaningful progress.

What Does This Study Tell Us?

This was a small, focused study: 20 people in one location over 8 weeks. While small studies have limits, they can offer valuable first-look insights into how a new device works in practice. The fact that 19 of 20 participants completed the full 8 weeks suggests the system was tolerable and usable for most people.

The results show that twiist can help users achieve solid glucose control and detect delivery problems quickly—two core goals of any automated insulin system. Larger and longer studies will help clarify how this system stacks up compared to others, and whether these early results hold up over months and years of real-world use.

Evidence label

Source: BMJ open diabetes research & care. Evidence type: PubMed indexed literature. Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.

Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.

More evidence-labeled coverage across the Type1Cure library.